Flashcards Studio

Facts: In a civil action for damages arising from a defective HVAC installation in a warehouse used for distribution, the plaintiff seeks ₱2,500,000 for replacement costs and lost throughput. The only evidence of quantum is a line-item repair schedule and supplier invoices; there is no independent engineering appraisal, no testimony linking the costs to the alleged defect, and no documentation establishing causation. At trial, the defense moves to strike or to reduce the damages for lack of proof of quantum. (a)Identify the controlling doctrine on quantum of damages and the burden of proof applicable to civil damages claims. (b)If the plaintiff’s evidence does not meet the required standard, what is the court’s likely disposition with respect to damages, and is nominal damages available under any circumstances? (c)If the plaintiff’s counsel knowingly inflates the claimed damages in pleadings to influence the outcome, what CPRA Sec. 32 violation arises and what disciplinary sanctions may attach?