Log In Create Account
Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Question Type
Question Source
0 tracked cards Remedial Law, Legal and Judicial Ethics, with Practical Exercises
Next

Question

In a civil action for breach of a confidentiality agreement, the plaintiff, Lila Santos, sues Echelon Tech, Inc. The confidentiality agreement (CA-18-02) was executed on February 20, 2018 and kept in the company’s human resources file. A flood on November 5, 2024 destroys the HR file; the original CA-18-02 cannot be found. A certified true copy of the CA remains in Echelon’s records. In proving the terms of CA-18-02, Santos offers the certified copy. (a) Identify the controlling doctrine about original documents and secondary evidence that applies to this fact pattern. (b) Is the certified true copy admissible to prove the CA’s terms? State the conditions that must be satisfied, and the role of the destruction of the original. (c) If the copy is not admissible as offered, what other documentary evidence or steps could properly prove the CA’s terms under the same doctrine?

Choose the Best Answer

Clara

Hello