Flashcards Studio

In a civil dispute over a land title destroyed in a flood, the movant seeks to admit a scanned TIFF image of the original title deed as secondary evidence on a conditional basis. The title deed was stored on the registrar’s server and the physical parchment is lost. The registrar’s custodian testifies that the TIFF is a faithful reproduction of the deed, including metadata such as recording date and marginal notes. The opposing party objects that the original document is not available and questions the fidelity of the scan. The trial court admits the TIFF on conditional grounds, stating it may be used only if the original is proven unavailable or properly authenticated; the copy remains provisional until those conditions are satisfied. (a) Identify the central doctrine governing conditional admissibility of secondary evidence in this context. (b) Distinguish the controlling rule regarding original versus duplicate evidence and the conditions for conditional admission. (c) Apply the doctrine to these facts: is the TIFF admissible now? what must be shown to make it fully admissible, and what issues could still affect its reliability or weight?