Log In Create Account
Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Question Type
Question Source
0 tracked cards Remedial Law, Legal and Judicial Ethics, with Practical Exercises
Next

Question

The People file information I1 in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) for murder based on the same set of facts. After arraignment, the court dismisses I1 for lack of probable cause, and the dismissal is without the express consent of the accused. The People then file a second information I2 in the same RTC charging the accused with parricide for the same incident. The accused moves to quash I2 on the ground of double jeopardy. (a)Identify the controlling doctrine and the controlling rule. (b)Distinguish double jeopardy from related doctrines (e.g., res judicata, former conviction, lesser-included offenses) and explain why they are or are not controlling in this scenario. (c)Apply the doctrine to the facts: should the second information be quashed? Why or why not?

Choose the Best Answer

Clara

Hello