Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
An accused charged with robbery with violence is arraigned in a rural municipality. The accused is illiterate and speaks a local dialect; a neighbor's whispered suggestions and insinuations from the prosecution accompany pressure. A translator is present, but the translator’s explanations of the elements and possible penalties are incomplete and occasionally misleading. Under these circumstances, the accused answers, “Guilty,” and the court accepts the plea without a meaningful inquiry into the elements or the consequences of a guilty plea. The defense later moves to treat the plea as improvident. (a) Identify the doctrine at issue. (b) Distinguish the improvident plea remedy from other plea-related remedies and explain when it applies. (c) Apply to the facts: should the court set aside the plea and re-arraign? If yes, what steps should follow and what would be the effect on the proceeding?