Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
Maria Luisa Tan, a private individual, discovers that a private online reputation service, ReputeGuard, maintains a 2010 disciplinary action entry against her in a professional-licensing context. The entry was the subject of a court disposition in 2013 that dismissed the action and expunged the record, but ReputeGuard continues to disseminate the entry to potential employers and licensing authorities. She files a petition for habeas data under A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC. ReputeGuard moves to dismiss, arguing that habeas data applies only to public records. In light of habeas data principles, discuss: (a) whether habeas data is applicable to private data controllers and the proper remedy under A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC; (b) the scope of relief, including the effect on third-party recipients and any notice or restraints on further use; (c) the role of the Data Privacy Act in relation to habeas data and any potential conflicts or limitations.