Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Remedial Law, Legal and Judicial Ethics, with Practical Exercises

Scenario: A law firm in Metro Manila uses its public Instagram account, managed by a non-lawyer marketing staffer, to promote a pending civil matter. The post identifies the client by full corporate name, lists the docket number CIV-2025-01234, and links to a press release containing case specifics and a claim of a favorable disposition in the RTC. In the comments, a screenshot is attached showing a private email exchange between the attorney and the client discussing settlement concessions, which the client never authorized for public disclosure. The client objects and asks for removal. Opposing counsel files a CPRA Secs. 36-44 complaint. (a) Identify the governing rule under Secs. 36-44 and the standard it sets for social media conduct by lawyers. (b) Apply the rule to the posts and determine whether they amount to professional misconduct, focusing on confidentiality, truthful/advertising aspects, and respect for the judiciary. (c) If misconduct is found, discuss potential sanctions and remedial steps appropriate under CPRA.

Choose the Best Answer

The governing rule under Secs. 36-44 CPRA requires lawyers to safeguard client confidentiality, avoid disclosing non-public information in public social media posts, and exercise prudence in advertising; the posts and the unauthorised private email disclosure amount to professional misconduct; sanctions may include reprimand, suspension, or disbarment, and remedial steps include removing the posts, issuing a public apology, and implementing a firm social media policy with training. The CPRA rules apply only to advertising and do not address confidentiality of client communications; since the client did not allege deception, the posts are permissible. Removal of the posts is mandatory but sanctions beyond a caution or admonition require substantial criminal-like penalties; in practice, the matter would go to the Bar Council for disciplinary review. Only the unauthorised disclosure of the private email constitutes misconduct; the public post identifying the client and docket number is permissible advertising if factual; the CPRA complaint should address only the chat disclosure.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.

More

Flashcards Studio

Question

Choose the Best Answer

Hello