Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
In a civil action for quieting of title and reconveyance of a parcel of land, a private electric utility, UtilCo, moves to intervene under Rule 19 on the ground that the parcel is crossed by an electric transmission line for which UtilCo has a confirmed easement. The trial court denies the motion, ruling that UtilCo’s interest is not direct. (a) State the controlling doctrine on intervention under Rule 19 and the requisites for intervention as a matter of right. (b) Distinguish intervention as of right from permissive intervention and the standards for each. (c) Apply to the facts: should UtilCo be allowed to intervene as a matter of right? If not, could intervention by permission be granted? What are the consequences for the intervenor and for the case if intervention is granted or denied?