Beta

Flashcards Studio

Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.

Study Settings View Stats

Topic

Question Type

Essay Multiple Choice

Question Source

All Jurisprudence based

0 tracked cards Labor and Social Legislation

A national shipping conglomerate in Metro Manila runs a fast-track program called the Regional Leadership Track (RLT) intended to groom personnel for regional director roles. Eligibility for RLT is restricted to employees who are not married and who have no dependent children, on the ground that handling international assignments would be easier for those without caregiving obligations. A 38-year-old married female employee with two children applies for RLT but is denied; a male employee with the same qualifications and no dependents is admitted. The female sues, alleging discrimination on the basis of gender and marital status under RA 9710 (as amended) and RA 8972, Sec. 7 (as amended). (a) Identify the governing doctrine and the essential elements of discrimination based on gender or marital status in employment. (b) Discuss whether the policy could be defended as a legitimate business necessity or whether it fails as discriminatory under the law. (c) Apply the facts: does the plaintiff’s treatment violate RA 9710 and RA 8972, Sec. 7 (as amended)? What relief should be awarded if discrimination is found?

Choose the Best Answer

RA 8972 Sec. 7 protects solo parents; since the plaintiff is married with children, the statute does not apply to her, and RA 9710 governs. Relief should still be limited to ordering non-discriminatory recruitment practices; the plaintiff loses on the merits. RA 9710 and RA 8972 Sec. 7 require the employer to provide reasonable accommodations for solo parents; since the plaintiff is not a solo parent, the court should only consider RA 9710; the proper remedy would be to award reinstatement to the RLT with back pay if discrimination is proven. The policy could be justified by a legitimate business necessity if the employer can show a demonstrable link between marital status and job performance; if proven, the court would uphold the policy and deny relief to the plaintiff. The policy constitutes unlawful gender and marital-status discrimination under RA 9710 and RA 8972 Sec. 7; it cannot be saved by a legitimate business necessity. Relief should include admission to the RLT, retroactive promotion, back pay, and compensation for losses suffered.

Load another random question

Your Progress

No data Retention

Tracked Cards: 0
Accuracy: No data
Retained: 0

View Detailed Analytics

Difficulty Breakdown

Answer flashcards to build a real score-based difficulty breakdown.

Current Streak 0 Days

Start a streak with this card.

Suggested Decks

View All

Leech Cards

Review

No recent weak flashcards in your saved workbook.

More

Flashcards Studio

Question

Choose the Best Answer

Hello