Flashcards Studio
Practice bar questions and get clear AI feedback on every answer.
Question
R is charged under the hypothetical Forest Denudation and Timber Laundering Act (FD-TLA), which punishes illegal logging and the transport and concealment of timber taken from protected forests but does not define conspiracy or accomplice liability. A financed the operation and arranged shell companies to move and conceal the timber, but did not touch the timber. (a) Under Article 10 of the Revised Penal Code, is the RPC applicable as the suppletory rule to determine A’s liability as an accomplice? (b) What elements must be proven to convict an accomplice under the RPC? (c) Apply to the facts: can A be convicted as an accomplice? If yes, what penalty attaches under the FD-TLA? If not, explain why.